When Did Jesus First Appear on Coins? Justinian II and the First Christ Portrait
When Did Jesus First Appear on Coins?
The story of Christ on Byzantine money, from Justinian II's revolutionary gold solidus, through the fury of Iconoclasm, to the anonymous bronze folles that proclaimed Christ King of Kings and remain surprisingly affordable today.
For centuries, Roman emperors put gods, goddesses, victories, temples, military standards, and eventually Christian symbols on their coins. But they did not put a portrait of Jesus Christ on them.
Then, near the end of the seventh century AD, that changed. Around AD 692, the Byzantine emperor Justinian II issued a remarkable new series of gold coins. Instead of placing the emperor's portrait on the obverse, the side traditionally dominated by the ruler, these coins displayed a frontal image of Christ. The issues of AD 692 to 695 are generally recognized as the first Byzantine imperial coinage to feature a portrait of Jesus Christ.
But the story did not end there. Christ would disappear from Byzantine coins. Religious images themselves would become the subject of an enormous political and theological conflict. Then Christ would return, eventually appearing across Byzantine gold and bronze and on the strange cup-shaped coins collectors call trachea. Some of those later coins are surprisingly affordable today. So when did Jesus first appear on a coin? The short answer is: under Justinian II, around AD 692. The longer story is much more interesting.
Christianity Appeared on Roman Coins Before Christ Did
It is important to separate two different questions. When did Christian imagery first appear on Roman coins? And when did a portrait of Christ appear? Those are not the same thing.
Christian symbols entered Roman imperial coinage centuries before Justinian II. The most famous early story involves Constantine the Great. During the early fourth century, Constantine openly favored Christianity, and Christian symbolism increasingly entered the visual language of Roman imperial power. The Chi-Rho, formed from the first two Greek letters of the name Christ, appeared in imperial contexts and on coinage. Crosses eventually became increasingly common. Emperors could hold a globus cruciger, a globe surmounted by a cross.
By the sixth and seventh centuries, someone handling Roman or Byzantine money could encounter unmistakably Christian imagery. But that still did not mean the coin showed Jesus himself. A cross represented Christianity. A Chi-Rho represented Christ. Neither attempted to show his face. Then Justinian II crossed that line.
Justinian II Changes Byzantine Coinage
Justinian II became emperor in AD 685. He ruled an empire centered on Constantinople that was dramatically different from the Roman world of Augustus or Constantine. But its inhabitants still considered themselves Romans. The empire was now thoroughly Christian. Its political ideology was Christian. And its emperor ruled within a sacred Christian understanding of imperial authority.
Around AD 692, Justinian II made that relationship visible on the empire's prestigious gold coinage. He placed Christ on the solidus. This was not a tiny cross hidden in the field. Christ dominated the obverse. And that mattered.
What Did the First Christ Coin Look Like?
The famous solidus of Justinian II's first reign presents a striking image. On the obverse appears a frontal bust of Christ. He has long hair and a beard. A cross appears within his halo. Christ raises his right hand in blessing. In his other hand he holds a book, understood as the Gospels. The inscription identifies him as IhS CRISTOS REX REGNANTIUM, or Jesus Christ, King of those who reign.
That message is extraordinarily important. Turn the coin over and you find Justinian II. The emperor holds Christian symbols of authority and identifies himself in the legend as SERVUS CHRISTI, Servant of Christ. The coin therefore tells us how its imagery should be understood. Christ is the ruler of rulers. Justinian is his servant.
Christ Takes the Emperor's Traditional Place
For centuries, the portrait of the ruler had dominated the obverse of Roman imperial coins. That was one of the most recognizable features of Roman money. Augustus. Nero. Trajan. Constantine. The emperor's portrait proclaimed imperial authority.
Justinian II made a remarkable change. Christ now occupied the obverse. Justinian moved to the reverse. We should not treat obverse versus reverse as a complete theological doctrine by itself. But combined with the inscriptions, the Christian hierarchy of the imagery is unmistakable. Christ is King of those who reign. Justinian is Servant of Christ. A tiny gold coin had become an expression of Christian imperial government.
Was This Supposed to Be an Actual Portrait of Jesus?
This requires an important distinction. Nobody at Justinian II's mint possessed a photograph or authenticated portrait of Jesus. The image belongs to the developing artistic traditions of Byzantine Christianity. By the seventh century, Christian artists had established recognizable ways of depicting Christ.
The first Justinian II type presents the familiar mature Christ: long hair, beard, frontal gaze, cross halo, blessing gesture, and Gospel book. The coin should therefore not be treated as evidence for exactly what the historical Jesus physically looked like. It tells us something different. It shows how Byzantine Christians of the seventh century represented Christ. That makes the coin important not only to numismatics, but also to the history of Christian art.
Did Christ Appear on a Coin Before Justinian II?
This question requires careful wording. Christian symbols and objects connected with Christianity appeared on Roman and Byzantine coins long before AD 692. There are also other categories of ancient objects, tokens, medallions, and uncertain or disputed pieces, that can complicate sweeping claims about the first image of Christ on anything resembling a coin.
But for official Byzantine imperial money, the answer is much clearer. The issues of Justinian II from approximately AD 692 to 695 are generally recognized as the first Byzantine imperial coinage to place a portrait of Christ prominently on the coin itself. That distinction matters. A cross is Christian. A Chi-Rho is Christian. A globus cruciger is Christian. But none is a portrait of Jesus. Justinian II's coinage represented something new.
Why Did Justinian II Do This Around AD 692?
The timing is fascinating. In 691 to 692, the Quinisext Council, also known as the Council in Trullo, met in Constantinople. Among the subjects addressed was the representation of Christ in Christian art. Canon 82 called for Christ to be represented in human form rather than symbolically as a lamb.
The timing of Justinian's new coinage is therefore striking. Around the same moment that church authorities were emphasizing the human representation of Christ, the imperial mint began placing a human image of Christ on gold coins. Scholars have long connected these developments. But caution is important. We cannot demonstrate with certainty that Canon 82 directly caused Justinian II to introduce the Christ portrait. What we can say is that both occurred within the same religious and artistic environment. The human image of Christ had acquired enormous theological significance.
Why Is This Still a Roman Coin?
This is one of the most important parts of the story. When Justinian II put Christ on his gold coinage, he did not believe he ruled a civilization called the Byzantine Empire. That is a modern historical label. Justinian was the Roman emperor. His subjects called themselves Romans. Constantinople was the capital of the Roman Empire as they understood it. Their political institutions, imperial titles, and monetary traditions had developed from the ancient Roman world.
That makes the appearance of Christ even more remarkable. The same imperial civilization whose earlier coins had depicted Jupiter, Mars, Venus, Apollo, Victory, and other traditional Greco-Roman gods and personifications had evolved until the supreme image on Roman imperial gold was Jesus Christ. The coin itself documents one of the greatest religious transformations in history.
Justinian II Is Overthrown
The story soon becomes much darker. Justinian II's first reign ended in AD 695. He was overthrown by Leontios. Justinian's nose was mutilated, apparently with the intention of physically disqualifying him from reclaiming the imperial office, and he was exiled to Cherson in Crimea.
That should have ended his political career. It did not. After years of exile, alliances, and plotting, Justinian returned. In AD 705, he regained Constantinople and became emperor again. It was one of the most extraordinary political comebacks in Byzantine history. And when Justinian returned, so did Christ on his coins.
Christ Appears Again During Justinian II's Second Reign
During Justinian II's restored reign from AD 705 to 711, Christ again appeared prominently on imperial gold. But something had changed. Christ looked different.
The first-reign type shows the familiar long-haired, mature Pantokrator image. The second-reign portrait presents a younger-looking Christ with shorter, tightly curled hair and a close beard. The contrast can be striking. The imperial mint was therefore not simply reproducing one permanently fixed portrait. Different visual traditions for representing Christ existed. Coins became part of the developing history of Christian portraiture.
Then Christ Disappears Again
Justinian II was overthrown for a second time in AD 711. This time he was killed. Christ's portrait disappeared from Byzantine imperial coinage. Within the following decades, the empire entered one of the fiercest religious controversies in Byzantine history: Iconoclasm.
What Was Byzantine Iconoclasm?
The term Iconoclasm refers to the rejection of religious images that divided the Byzantine Empire during portions of the eighth and ninth centuries. Could Christians depict Christ? The Virgin Mary? The saints? Did venerating sacred images become idolatry? Or could an image legitimately represent the sacred person depicted?
The dispute involved emperors, patriarchs, bishops, monks, church councils, imperial politics, destroyed or altered images, restored images, and competing theological arguments. Byzantine Iconoclasm is usually divided into two major periods. The first ran approximately AD 726/730 to 787, when the policy developed under eighth-century emperors before icons were officially restored at the Second Council of Nicaea in 787. The second ran AD 815 to 843, when iconoclast policies returned before religious images were finally restored in 843.
What Did Iconoclast Coins Show?
During iconoclastic periods, imperial coinage avoided portrait images of Christ. Crosses remained important. Emperors remained. Dynastic imagery remained. But the portrait of Christ did not.
This makes Byzantine coins valuable evidence for religious history. You can watch imperial religious policy change through the money. Under Justinian II, Christ appears. During the later iconoclastic periods, Christ is absent. After the final defeat of Iconoclasm, Christ returns. Few historical objects make changes in imperial religious imagery so physically visible.
The Triumph of Orthodoxy
In AD 843, sacred images were definitively restored under the regency of Empress Theodora for her young son, Emperor Michael III. The event became known as the Triumph of Orthodoxy. The theological defense of icons prevailed within Byzantine Orthodoxy.
And the consequences eventually appeared on money. Christ returned to Byzantine imperial coinage under Michael III in the mid-ninth century, in the aftermath of the final restoration of icons. After more than a century of religious controversy, Christ's portrait was again placed on Roman imperial money.
Christ Returns to Byzantine Gold
Under Michael III and subsequent emperors, sacred portraiture returned to imperial coinage. Under Basil I, founder of the Macedonian dynasty, and his successors, Christ became increasingly prominent on Byzantine gold. Christ might appear as a bust or enthroned, holding the Gospels and blessing. The emperor occupied the opposite side. The fundamental message first made dramatically visible under Justinian II remained powerful: earthly imperial authority existed beneath divine authority.
Christ Enthroned
One of the most powerful later Byzantine coin designs depicts Christ seated on a throne. He holds the Gospels. A cross nimbus surrounds his head. The emperor appears elsewhere on the coin. This imagery goes beyond simply identifying Christ. It presents him as a ruler, a celestial king. That was perfectly suited to Byzantine political theology. The earthly emperor governed the Roman Empire. Christ was King of Kings.
Then Came the Anonymous Folles
For collectors, this may be one of the most fascinating developments in the entire story. Beginning under John I Tzimiskes, AD 969 to 976, Byzantine bronze coinage entered an extraordinary phase. The empire began issuing coins that modern numismatists call Anonymous Folles.
Why anonymous? Because the coins omit the name and portrait of the reigning emperor. Instead, Christ dominates the coin. That is extraordinary. Roman imperial money had spent centuries displaying the ruler. Now a major circulating bronze coin could omit him entirely.
What Does an Anonymous Follis Show?
The exact design depends on the class. Many anonymous folles show a frontal image of Christ. He may hold the Gospel book, raise his hand in blessing, wear a cross nimbus, and face directly toward the viewer. The reverse of many examples carries a Greek inscription proclaiming Jesus Christ, King of Kings. Different classes use different arrangements and abbreviations, so there is no single reverse inscription shared identically by every anonymous follis. But the message is unmistakable. These coins do not merely display Christian symbolism. They proclaim Christ as supreme ruler.
Why Were They Anonymous?
The precise motivations behind the anonymous bronze series are more complicated than any one explanation. We should not pretend that we possess an imperial decree saying exactly why the emperor's portrait was removed. But whatever the precise motivation, the symbolism is extraordinary. The emperor could change. Christ did not. For generations, imperial bronze money could circulate without identifying the emperor who issued it. The authority represented on the coin was Christ.
John I Tzimiskes Begins the Anonymous Series
The first anonymous bronze folles, conventionally classified as Class A1, are associated with John I Tzimiskes, AD 969 to 976. That gives us an important chronological starting point. The series then continued under later emperors. Under Basil II and Constantine VIII, the Class A tradition developed into the larger and extremely well-known Class A2 and related issues.
Collectors eventually encounter classifications such as Class A1, Class A2, Class A3, Class B, Class C, and additional later classes. The emperor may be absent, but details of Christ's portrait, ornaments, reverse inscriptions, decorative marks, size, and style allow numismatists to classify the coins and associate them approximately with particular periods and reigns.
Basil II and the Anonymous Follis
The reign of Basil II, from AD 976 to 1025, overlaps with some of the most famous anonymous bronze issues. Basil became one of the greatest military emperors in Byzantine history. He fought prolonged wars in the Balkans. He destroyed the independent Bulgarian Empire. He strengthened Byzantine power during one of the empire's most formidable periods.
Yet someone using bronze money during his reign could carry a coin showing Christ rather than Basil II. One of medieval history's most powerful emperors did not always need his face on everyday bronze money. That contrast says something remarkable about Byzantine imperial culture.
Were Anonymous Folles Valuable Coins?
These were base-metal coins. They were not equivalent to Byzantine gold. That is actually one reason they are so interesting for collectors today. Gold coins naturally tended to represent larger values and are generally more expensive in the modern collector market. Bronze coins circulated extensively and could become heavily worn.
Anonymous folles therefore offer a comparatively accessible way to own genuine Byzantine money carrying a prominent portrait of Christ. You do not need to begin with a Justinian II solidus. You can enter this history through bronze.
Christ on Cup-Shaped Byzantine Coins
The physical form of Byzantine money later changed dramatically. By the eleventh and twelfth centuries, concave or cup-shaped coins became characteristic of Byzantine coinage. Modern collectors commonly call these coins trachea. They were produced within several monetary denominations and in different metals, particularly as the Byzantine monetary system developed around and after the major reform of Alexios I Komnenos in AD 1092.
Christian imagery remained central. Christ could appear on one side. The emperor might appear on the other. The Virgin Mary and saints also became important parts of Byzantine monetary imagery. A flat gold solidus of Justinian II and a later concave Byzantine coin may look completely different. But they belong to the same long tradition of placing sacred Christian figures on Roman imperial money.
Alexios I and the World of the First Crusade
This makes Christ-bearing Byzantine coinage especially interesting for collectors of Crusader history. Alexios I Komnenos ruled from 1081 to 1118. His requests for western military assistance contributed to the circumstances that eventually produced the First Crusade. In 1095, Pope Urban II preached the Crusade at Clermont. Western armies subsequently traveled through Byzantine territory toward the eastern Mediterranean.
The monetary world those crusaders encountered was explicitly Christian. Byzantine coins of the Komnenian period could show Christ, the Virgin, saints, and the emperor. A collector can therefore own a coin from the Byzantine monetary world through which the First Crusade passed.
Christ, the Virgin, and Byzantine Imperial Authority
Why did sacred figures become so prominent on Byzantine money? Because Byzantine government did not understand religion and politics as completely separate worlds in the modern sense. The emperor ruled a Christian empire. He defended Christianity. He participated in church politics. Emperors called councils and interacted closely with patriarchs and bishops. Imperial legitimacy existed within a Christian worldview.
Coinage became an ideal place to express that relationship. On one side, Christ. On the other, emperor. That was not merely decoration. It was political theology carried in a purse.
Can You Own a Coin From the First Christ Portrait Issue?
Yes. But you may need a serious budget. Gold solidi of Justinian II from the first Christ portrait issue survive and appear on the collector market. Their combination of religious importance, Byzantine history, gold, rarity, and artistic significance makes them highly desirable.
Condition matters. Type matters. Style matters. Rarity matters. Provenance matters. Exceptional examples can command substantial prices. Fortunately, Justinian II is not the only way to collect Christ on Byzantine money.
Affordable Byzantine Coins Showing Christ
This is where the subject becomes much more accessible. Collectors can encounter several approachable options.
- Anonymous folles. Large Byzantine bronze coins carrying prominent portraits of Christ. These are among the most accessible and historically satisfying options.
- Later Byzantine bronzes. Other Byzantine bronze issues can contain explicitly Christian imagery and remain approachable for collectors.
- Billon trachea. Cup-shaped Byzantine billon coins can depict Christ and may cost dramatically less than Byzantine gold.
- Later concave coinage. Depending on ruler, period, and denomination, later Byzantine coinage provides numerous opportunities to collect sacred imagery.
You do not necessarily need thousands of dollars to own a genuine medieval Byzantine coin depicting Christ. That is one of the remarkable things about collecting Byzantine coins.
What Should a Beginner Buy?
If your goal is "I want a genuine Byzantine coin showing Jesus Christ," one of the best places to start is an anonymous follis. Why? Because they are unmistakably Byzantine, explicitly Christian, historically important, large enough to appreciate the design, generally much more affordable than Byzantine gold, and fascinating to classify.
A good anonymous follis gives a new collector an object whose historical meaning is immediately visible. You do not have to explain where the Christian connection is hidden. Christ is right there.
How to Identify Christ on a Byzantine Coin
Several features can help you recognize Christ on Byzantine money.
- Cross halo. Christ is frequently depicted with a halo containing a cross.
- Gospel book. He may hold a book understood as the Gospels.
- Blessing gesture. His raised hand may form a Christian gesture of blessing.
- Frontal portrait. Christ is often shown facing directly toward the viewer rather than in the profile portrait familiar from many earlier Roman imperial coins.
- Religious inscriptions. Legends may identify Jesus Christ or proclaim him as ruler.
These conventions became important features of Byzantine Christian art. Learn them on coins and you may begin recognizing the same visual language in icons, mosaics, manuscripts, and church decoration.
How Did the Image of Christ Change?
Christ's portrait was never completely fixed. Different periods emphasized different artistic styles. Some portraits appear more naturalistic. Others become increasingly stylized. Some show Christ as a bust. Others show him enthroned. Some emphasize long hair and a beard. Others use different facial proportions and hairstyles.
We can see this transformation almost immediately by comparing Justinian II's first- and second-reign coinage. Those changes parallel broader developments in Byzantine art. A collection of Christ-bearing coins can therefore become more than a numismatic set. It can become a miniature history of Byzantine Christian art.
Building a Christ on Byzantine Coins Collection
A collector could build a remarkable historical sequence.
- Justinian II solidus, AD 692 to 695. The generally recognized first Byzantine imperial coinage carrying a portrait of Christ. This would be the major centerpiece.
- Michael III or later post-Iconoclast gold. Christ returns to imperial coinage following the final restoration of sacred images.
- Anonymous follis. Christ replaces the emperor as the dominant figure on circulating bronze money.
- Komnenian coin. Christian imagery from the Byzantine world of the Crusades.
- Later Byzantine concave coin. The continuation of sacred imagery into the later centuries of the empire.
A collector could also build a much more affordable version using primarily bronze and billon. The metals would change. The historical story would remain.
Why These Coins Matter Beyond Christianity
You do not have to be religious to understand why these coins matter. They document an enormous transformation in Roman civilization. Earlier Roman coins could show Jupiter, Mars, Venus, Victory, Hercules, and Apollo. Roman authorities had once persecuted Christians, although persecution varied enormously by period and place.
Constantine later openly favored Christianity and brought Christian symbolism increasingly into imperial power. Later emperors made Christianity central to Roman government. Crosses became normal on money. Then Christ himself appeared on imperial gold. The Virgin appeared. Saints appeared. Money became physical evidence of one of the greatest religious transformations in human history. Few historical objects demonstrate that transition as clearly as coins.
Rome Did Not Simply Disappear, It Changed
This may be the most important thing these coins teach us. We often divide Roman and Byzantine history into separate categories. The people producing these coins did not see the division that way. They were Romans. Their emperor was Emperor of the Romans. Their empire was the Roman Empire. Their capital was Constantinople.
Their civilization had changed enormously from the world of Augustus. The language of government increasingly shifted toward Greek. The empire's territory changed. Its military changed. Its economy changed. Its religion changed. But Roman identity continued. That means a Justinian II solidus can simultaneously be understood as Roman money, Byzantine money, Christian art, imperial propaganda, and a historical document. That is what makes these coins so extraordinary.
So When Did Jesus First Appear on Coins?
The first generally recognized portrait of Jesus Christ on Byzantine imperial coinage appeared under Emperor Justinian II around AD 692. His gold issues of approximately AD 692 to 695 placed a frontal portrait of Christ on the obverse while Justinian appeared on the reverse as the servant of Christ. Earlier Roman and Byzantine coins had already used Christian symbols, including crosses and the Chi-Rho, but Justinian II's coinage represented a major new step by placing an actual portrait of Christ on imperial money.
Christ's portrait disappeared after Justinian II. The empire subsequently endured the long controversy over religious images known as Iconoclasm. After the final restoration of icons in AD 843, Christ returned to imperial coinage under Michael III. Later he appeared prominently on Byzantine gold. Beginning under John I Tzimiskes in AD 969, Christ even dominated the famous anonymous bronze folles while the emperor's name and portrait disappeared entirely. Christ then remained an important part of Byzantine monetary imagery into the era of the Crusades and beyond. What began as a revolutionary image became part of the visual language of the Christian Roman Empire.
Final Thoughts
Imagine being alive when Justinian II's new gold coins entered circulation. For centuries, Roman imperial money had been dominated by rulers. The emperor's portrait represented political authority. Then someone placed one of Justinian's new solidi in your hand. On the obverse was not Justinian. It was Christ. Around him the coin proclaimed Jesus Christ, King of those who reign. Turn it over. There was the Roman emperor. And his own coin called him Servant of Christ.
That tiny piece of gold expressed an enormous transformation. Roman authorities had once persecuted followers of Christianity. Centuries later, Christianity had become central to Roman imperial government. Crosses appeared on Roman money. And eventually Christ himself occupied the traditional place of the emperor on imperial gold. Then his image became entangled in one of the greatest religious controversies of the medieval world. It disappeared. It returned. And eventually ordinary Byzantine bronze coins could proclaim Christ King of Kings.
Those coins still survive. Some are rare gold pieces worthy of major collections. Others are modest bronze coins accessible to ordinary collectors. But together they preserve the same extraordinary story: a religion that began in a province of the Roman Empire eventually placed the image of Christ on Roman imperial money.
History wasn't just written. It was minted.
Own a Byzantine Coin That Shows Christ
Hold a real, genuine Byzantine bronze coin that once proclaimed Christ King of Kings, an accessible way into one of the greatest religious transformations in history.
Browse Byzantine Coins